Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) ended his long-shot presidential bid Monday, telling supporters in a web video that he succeeded in changing the conversation about how to fight the Islamic State.
"Four months ago, at the very first debate, I said that any candidate who did not understand that we need more American troops on the ground in Iraq and Syria to defeat ISIL was not ready to be commander in chief," said Graham. "At that time, no one stepped forward to join me. Today, most of my fellow candidates have come to recognize this is what's needed." The Islamic State, a terrorist organization that controls large tracts of Iraq and Syria, is also known as ISIS and ISIL.
Graham's bid, which never cracked 1 percent in primary polls, locked up an unusual amount of elite support. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), his closest friend in the Senate, immediately endorsed Graham and campaigned with him throughout New Hampshire. Scores of South Carolina donors, who might have otherwise jumped to higher-polling candidates, stayed on Graham's team out of loyalty -- and on the chance that his moderate campaign broke through.
By leaving the race Monday, Graham was able to remove his name from his home state's primary ballot, creating the sort of free-for-all that candidates such as Jeb Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) have desired for months. Matt Moore, the chairman of the South Carolina Republican Party, confirmed that Graham was off the ballot within 40 minutes of the announcement going public.
Just six days ago, Graham -- whose sizable Senate campaign war chest gave him more financial stability than other underdogs -- was resisting any rumor that he might quit or pull his name off the ballot. In the Las Vegas debate spin room, after what will have been his last "undercard" performance, Graham said that he would push at least through the New Hampshire primary. Yet privately, according to Graham strategist Brett O'Donnell, the senator was thinking about a way out of the race.
"It’s something he’s been contemplating for a while and he waited for a bit, just wanted to make sure," O'Donnell said in an interview. "It came together over the weekend but it’s been on his mind for a few weeks. If you know him, you know he’s fiscally responsible. He was raised that way and he didn’t want to go into debt on the campaign. I know that was weighing on him. He wanted to go out on his own terms. So, after a great debate last week -- he dominated the undercard in our view -- it was time. He ends it on a high."
Still, he would have preferred to end it a little higher. In January, when Graham announced his presidential exploratory committee, he was excited about the chance to challenge Sen. Rand Paul (R-S.C.) to a foreign policy debate. In June, when Donald Trump entered the Republican race, Paul flagged and Graham became the mogul's bluntest critic.
Yet network and party decisions to cleave the swollen Republican field into main stage and "undercard" debates meant that Graham never got to confront either man. An effort to change the format, which O'Donnell participated in, did not elevate the candidate to prime time. He was left making his arguments on the more accessible, and familiar, format of cable news interviews. On Monday, he returned to that role, giving CNN an interview about how the Republican Party needed to follow his lead on foreign policy.
"My campaign has come to the point where I need to think about getting out and helping somebody else," Graham told CNN's Kate Bolduan after the announcement. "Jeb and Marco are very sync with where I’m at. [So are] Christie and Kasich."
No comments